Google Links

Follow the links below to find material targeted to the unit's elements, performance criteria, required skills and knowledge

Elements and Performance Criteria

  1. Determine software fault to be corrected
  2. Identify and isolate fault
  3. Design fix for fault
  4. Carry out fix to software
  5. Test fix and associated system areas
  6. Hand over to systems operations area

Required Skills

Required skills

analytical skills to review software fault details and interpret complex technical data

communication skills to liaise with clients

literacy skills to interpret and write technical documents

planning and organisational skills to ensure adherence to standards and procedures in programming

problemsolving skills to consider alternative options and possible impacts

technical skills to use customise and adapt software packages

Required knowledge

detailed knowledge of

concepts relating to system performance

concepts relating to testing of software systems

current industryaccepted hardware and software products and their general features and capabilities

systems current functionality

Evidence Required

The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria required skills and knowledge range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package

Overview of assessment

Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit

Evidence of the ability to

effectively maintain custom software

apply a fix that works

deploy a possible range of solutions to produce the same results

Context of and specific resources for assessment

Assessment must ensure access to

fault logs and helpdesk reports

software development tools documentation and environment

source code and libraries

appropriate learning and assessment support when required

modified equipment for people with special needs

Method of assessment

A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge The following examples are appropriate for this unit

evaluation of completed code

review of candidates updated program documentation

verbal or written questioning to determine candidates understanding of

impact of changes on applications and systems

programming standards

Guidance information for assessment

Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector workplace and job role is recommended where appropriate

Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and suitable to the communication skill level language literacy and numeracy capacity of the candidate and the work being performed

Indigenous people and other people from a nonEnglish speaking background may need additional support

In cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess required knowledge


Range Statement

The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included.

Technical data may be obtained from:

error messages

memory dumps

software traces

other information.

Appropriate person may include:

authorised business representative

client

supervisor.

Documentation may follow:

audit trails

International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and Australian Standards (AS) standards

maintaining equipment inventory, client training and satisfaction reports

naming standards

project-management templates and report writing

version control.